Q17.
Criteria for empirically
supported therapies
have been defined by Chambless and Hollon (1998). When is a therapy
considered efficacious in this context?
Learning outcomes: 5.7
Student
answer
Chambless and Hollon (1998)
define empirically supported therapies as being considered
efficacious if they have at least 2 sets of evidence that show it
is more effective than placebo, control or as effective/more
effective as another evidenced therapy and with any conflict
issues having been complexly resolved. If there is only one set of
evidence it may be considered possibly efficacious.
In order to do this
(LO 5.7 An
understanding of the term 'empirically supported
therapies/treatments'.)
|
Tutor
feedback (DO NOT delete/edit feedback. Write amendments,
additional information & thoughts underneath this table)
Correct.
You have demonstrated your understanding of the term, thank you.
|
Further Student Example Answer: The criteria defined by Chambless and Hollon considers a minimum of 2 separate tests showing superior results of experiments against medications, placebos and previously accredited treatments. The experiments they evaluated were for limited illnesses only:
Anxiety and stress,
insomnia, pain management and certain psychosomatic illness only.
PLEASE
RESUBMIT with reference to Chambless and Hollon's three main points
on efficacy. More detail required on the specifics of the term
efficacious.
(Further
student work goes here if requested through feedback)
The criteria for
judging the efficacy of the testing process requires studies to
produce repeatable results in at least 2 different study facilities
or separate research groups where all known biases, limitations and
conflicts are identified and/or resolved for the end results to be
considered efficacious in those particular studies.
If it effective in
only one of the tests then it is classed as possibly efficacious.
1.The importance of
being able to reproduce the same results independently before a
treatment has been identified for its efficacy is emphasised, and a
large number of factors must be elaborated and considered in
evaluating whether studies supporting a particular treatment or
processes efficacy are sound.
2. The therapy must
be compared with a no treatment control group, an alternative
therapy, or placebo. The results must be shown to be more beneficial
than no therapy or placebo AND at least equivalent to an alternative
or established therapy.
3. The empirical
study must use sound scientific methods.
No comments:
Post a Comment